twgivjowrsx

Get Free Ebook How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series)

In investing the leisure time, lots of people have different methods. Yet, making the exact same one, reading the How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration And Society Series) can be done perfectly. Also it is in various time, you all can get the features and advantages of guide to read. It is kind of book with the particular topic to get rid of the daily issues. When you need type of home entertainment, this book is likewise ideal sufficient.

How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series)

Get Free Ebook How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series)

What kind of reviewing book are you looking for currently? If you are really fond of the subject similar to How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration And Society Series), you could take it directly right here. This publication is in fact a typical book. However, just how the author get words to create this book is so extraordinary. You might not locate anything unique from the cover as well as the title of guide, yet you could get everything unique from guide after read.

However below, we will certainly reveal you astonishing point to be able always review the e-book How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration And Society Series) any place as well as whenever you take location and also time. The e-book How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration And Society Series) by just can help you to realize having guide to review each time. It won't obligate you to constantly bring the thick e-book wherever you go. You can merely maintain them on the kitchen appliance or on soft documents in your computer to consistently check out the area during that time.

Reading a publication could help you to open up the new globe. From knowing nothing to understanding everything can be reached when checking out books lot of times. As many people state, more publications you review, much more things you need to know, yet couple of things you will certainly feel. Yeah, reviewing the book will certainly lead your mind to open minded as well as always attempt to seek for the other understanding, also from lots of sources. How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration And Society Series) as a method of how guide is advised will be available for you to obtain it.

In order to reduce you to get this publication to review, we present the soft file kinds, it will allow you constantly get guide. When the shop or library is out of the books, this website will not run out of the book stocks. So, you will always find, every time you are here as well as going to get it. Simply find this book title of How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration And Society Series) as in the looking box. It will aid you to reduce locate the link that is provided.

Review

Posner is unique in the world of American jurisprudence, a highly regarded U.S. appellate judge and a prolific and controversial writer on legal philosophy. Opinionated, sarcastic and argumentative as ever, Posner is happy to weigh in not only on how judges think, but how he thinks they should think. When sticking to explaining the nine intellectual approaches to judging that he identifies, and to the gap between legal academics and judges, and his well-formulated pragmatic approach to judging, Posner is insightful, accessible, often funny and a model of clarity. (Publishers Weekly 2008-02-11)Posner's latest book, How Judges Think, is important, if only because it's Posner looking at his own profession from the inside. Two of the chapters, "Judges Are Not Law Professors" and "Is Pragmatic Adjudication Inescapable?," are worth the price of admission by themselves. The book can be read as one long screed against the jurisprudence of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and stands as a refutation to those who believe the category of conservative can lazily be applied to a mind as independent as Posner's. (Barry Gewen New York Times online 2008-07-09)A prolific and brilliant writer, Posner's How Judges Think is perhaps his most illuminating work for its profound, and sometimes polemical, insights into the judicial process...Judge Posner's examination of the issues is thorough, scholarly and riveting. He has written an important book--a must read not just for lawyers, but also for anyone who wants to understand how the inscrutable, and sometimes oracular, process of judging really works. (James D. Zirin Forbes.com 2010-06-08)

Read more

From the Back Cover

From the book:Ivan Karamazov said that if God does not exist everything is permitted, and traditional legal thinkers are likely to say that if legalism (legal formalism, orthodox legal reasoning, a "government of laws not men," the "rule of law" as celebrated in the loftiest "Law Day" rhetoric, and so forth) does not exist everything is permitted to judges--so watch out! Legalism does exist, and so not everything is permitted. But its kingdom has shrunk and greyed to the point where today it is largely limited to routine cases, and so a great deal is permitted to judges. Just how much is permitted and how they use their freedom are the principal concerns of this book.. . .I am struck by how unrealistic are the conceptions of the judge held by most people, including practicing lawyers and eminent law professors, who have never been judges--and even by some judges. This unrealism is due to a variety of things, including the different perspectives of the different branches of the legal profession--including also a certain want of imagination. It is also due to the fact that most judges are cagey, even coy, in discussing what they do. They tend to parrot an official line about the judicial process (how rule-bound it is), and often to believe it, though it does not describe their actual practices. This book parts the curtain a bit.

Read more

See all Editorial Reviews

Product details

Series: Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series

Paperback: 400 pages

Publisher: Harvard University Press; Reprint edition (May 1, 2010)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 9780674048065

ISBN-13: 978-0674048065

ASIN: 0674048067

Product Dimensions:

6.2 x 1.2 x 9.5 inches

Shipping Weight: 1.8 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review:

4.0 out of 5 stars

30 customer reviews

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

#700,630 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

Posner is pretty much the Go-To Guy in legal studies today. You may disagree with his conclusions but he won’t bore you (he’s a forceful writer), you won’t find it hard to follow him (he writes clearly), and you won’t wonder whether he has a hidden agenda (he is open and forthright in stating his sources, as well as any reservations he has about his own conclusions drawn from them). He’s academic (well documented and well reasoned) but not overly academic: his observations are always rooted in experience, for he is both an eminent teacher of jurisprudence at the University of Chicago and an acting federal circuit court judge, with years of practice on the bench. His books are not easy reads –he explores complicated issues and doesn’t simplify them—but you’ll never get lost in them, because he is an exceptionally articulate explainer. Years ago, when I was a history professor at a small women’s college in the east, I taught a course on historical method, and it was writers (thinkers) (scholars) like Posner I wanted to introduce to my students, not that he writes like historians do but that he writes forcefully, sparingly, lucidly and compellingly, and persuasion is just as important a part of any scholar’s business as explication.This is the third book by Posner that I have read. All three books were good. Two –including this one—are superb, models of engaged scholarship. (If you haven’t read anything by him before, I recommend you start with Reflections on Judging, 2013.) Posner is It.Arguing against legalism and various forms of moralism, Posner argues for a restrained pragmatic approach to the law, in line with his models on the bench, especially Holmes (“The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience”), who accepted that the written law only went so far and that beyond that point, the prudent judge crossed from enforcing pre-existing, stringent rules to making new law. Law in action is imprecise but not amorphous. “In our system the law as it is enforced in courts is created by judges, using legal propositions as raw materials.” He does not argue that a judge can make any law he wants. Rather, he argues that in any but the most constrained case, the judge must choose among courses of action that are not automatically (because the law tells the judge exactly what to do) clean --or should I say clear? From this simple premise –that judges are de facto legislators—Posner moves to a critique of many, maybe most academic commentators on the law, and a scathing critique of what is taught in even the best law schools in our country. He has, is in other books, harsh words to say about Justice Scalia’s supposed originalism, which he finds inadequate and self-deceiving –even Scalia admitted that he moved beyond it at times.If I were a lawyer, I would read this book NOW.

In this erudite and highly readable book, a distinguished judge and scholar provides the reader with remarkable insights into how judges think, or ought to think, when interpreting and creating the law. Judge Posner rejects sterile legalist theories in favor of a pragmatic approach to judicial decision-making, heavily influenced by economic theory. Drawing on insights from psychology, American legal history, and economics, Judge Posner argues persuasively that judges are not rule-bound adjudicating machines mechanically applying the law; rather judges creatively engage the real world by balancing competing interests, weighing consequences, and applying cost/benefit analyses when interpreting the law. In the process, judges, at least in the unique American judicial system, inevitably act as legislators and, yes, as human beings, they are influenced by life experiences, political beliefs, and psychological make-up. The result is a highly sophisticated and nuanced discussion of how judges think, or at least how they should think. This book is written in a lively style, with humor, wit, and a great deal of wisdom, including some very practical advice regarding how attorneys should frame their arguments when they appear in court. (Hint: instead of focusing on words; focus on the real world consequences of your arguments).

If you have been inside the world Judge Posner writes about, you will know how extraordinarily practical this book is. This is how judges think - not how they think they think. Legal decisions arise in real contexts and judges almost always react in part to that context. If they did not, then our law would be the same as it was in 1242. Posner illuminates the pragmatic truth clearly while providing ample theoretical background for the budding philosopher.At a time when the merely thoughtless insist that the "law be applied as written" (how, exactly, does one apply the phrase "equal protection" as written and divorced from context?)this refreshing burst of candor and common sense presented by the greatest legal mind of the past 50 years is critically important reading.

How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) PDF
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) EPub
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) Doc
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) iBooks
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) rtf
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) Mobipocket
How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) Kindle

How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) PDF

How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) PDF

How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) PDF

How Judges Think (Pims - Polity Immigration and Society Series) PDF